Late Roman Bronze Coins

Late Roman Bronze Forum

News:

contact email  victors@vcoins.com

What kind of Fraction?

Started by KostasAlexander, August 28, 2022, 01:29:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

KostasAlexander

I was going through some coins of mine that I had neglected to catalog and this Maxentius fractional has me stumped.

By looking at it, it appears to be straightforward - RIC VI 238 (Roma) - Half Follis. The only issue is the size and the weight don't really line up for that one; this coin is 16mm and weights 1.70g, which would be more in line for the smaller fractions (Third/Quarter Follis, etc) ... only issue is that there doesn't appear to be this reverse legend recorded for that type with a mint mark present. RIC VI 281c would line up - only problem is this issue doesn't have a mint mark.

I've looked through Lech's site but could not find anything. Am I missing something? Does anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks!

[attachment id=0 msg=6846]  [attachment id=1 msg=6846]

Heliodromus

It's RIC VI Rome 238.

There's also RIC 237 which is VOT QQ MVL X (vs RIC 238 XX).

KostasAlexander

#2
The half-folles, which RIC VI 238 is should weigh 3.0g - this one is much lighter in weight. The smaller fractions weigh around 2g, which this one more closely matches up to - but the only two reverse legends in this grouping for the smaller fractions are AETERNAE MEMORIAE and VOT / X / FEL. Any idea why the big discrepancy?

Heliodromus

From the examples I've recorded, yours seems about typical size/weight for the type.

Maxentius seems to have issued two denominations of fractions.

The VOT X FEL type measures around 19-20mm and weighs ~2.7g

The VICTORIA AETERNA AVG N (VOT X) fraction seems to be same denomination as VOT X FEL, although I've seen a few heavy outliers at 3.29g, 3.66g, 3.86g. I assume that as usual it's the die size that is being controlled and the flan size and weight are not really very good diagnostics.

The VOT QQ MVL X & XX types are clearly a smaller fraction and seem to average around 17mm with weights in 1.7-2.2g range.

I'm not totally clear what fraction of a nummus these two denominations represent, maybe 1/2 and 1/3 (although many nummi seems to be well above the implied weight standard). The above sizes and weights are from actual specimens.

KostasAlexander

Thank you for the insight, much appreciated!

Victor

here's my RIC 237

Maxentius
A.D. 310- 312
Æ half-follis
16x17mm   2.2 gm
MAXENTI-VS P F AVG; Laureate head right.
VOT/ Q Q / MVL /X in four lines within laurel wreath.
In ex. RS
RIC VI Rome 237