Author Topic: Constantine I SOLI INVICTO COMITI from London  (Read 657 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Victor

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • Country: us
  • all my best friends are dead Romans
    • Victor's Imperial Coins
Constantine I SOLI INVICTO COMITI from London
« on: December 29, 2020, 01:01:47 PM »
Here's a nice example of this type with an unusual flan. RIC mistakenly has this coin as cuirassed when it is trabeate. It is corrected in the London mint book.


Constantine I
A.D. 316
20x23mm    3.2g
CONSTANTINVS P AVG; laureate and trabeated bust left.
SOLI INVICTO COMITI; Sol rad., stg. L., raising r. hand, globe in l., chlamys across l. shoulder, across fields S/P.
in ex. MSL
RIC VII London 75 corr.; LMCC 8.07.018

Offline Heliodromus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
  • Country: us
Re: Constantine I SOLI INVICTO COMITI from London
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2020, 02:12:10 PM »
Nice! I still don't have this type myself, or quadriga type from same issue. Back in the good old days of 10-15 years ago the quadriga would occasionally appear for sale, but I haven't seen one in a long while.

I assume that Constantine's rare trabeate busts are all specifically the trabea consularis, so despite RIC's 316 date this should really be 315 for COS IIII.

Offline Victor

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • Country: us
  • all my best friends are dead Romans
    • Victor's Imperial Coins
Re: Constantine I SOLI INVICTO COMITI from London
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2020, 02:43:27 PM »
Yes, in LMCC they date this issue to late 314- early 315, but I didn't change my RIC description. I have had two other examples of RIC 75, but sold them. I almost had a quadriga example, but it seems it was lost in shipping...maybe it will show up-- it has only been five years.


Offline Heliodromus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
  • Country: us
Re: Constantine I SOLI INVICTO COMITI from London
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2020, 03:12:27 PM »
That's annoying to lose something like that in the mail, although I was reading the other day of a record case where the post office delivered something 100 years later, so never say never !  ::)