Taking a break from attributing some pick-bin finds, I’d like to throw out a question about the bust on this coin.
CONSTANTINVSIVNNOBC Laureate and cuirassed bust left, seen from front, holding Victory on globe in right hand, unknown object on left arm.
VIRTVS-EXERCIT Standard with VOT/XX on drapery and with captive on each side. Iota-Chi monogram (?) in left field, PT in exergue.
3,15 gm. Ø 21 mm.
RIC VII, 121; Sear IV: 17299; Voetter (Gerin): 5 (Tarraco); Cohen 256.
The more elaborate Constantinian bust types can be quite confusing. It’s sometimes difficult to tell whether a bust is draped or wearing an elaborate cuirass, and there are also differing views on the various accoutrements. This specimen is worn and corroded, but the obverse is clear enough to be a good example.
The coin is listed as type I1 in RIC VII (laureate, draped, Victory on globe in right hand, mappa in left. In his key to obverse busts (p. 88 ff.), Bruun also lists a type I2 (sceptre instead of mappa in right hand) and adds in a footnote that the two are probably identical, adding that the “object in the l. hand, frequently described as a sceptre or sword handle, is probably a mappa”.
On the Not in RIC website, Lech Stępniewski comments on this: “… mappa seems to be the rarest possibility. Many of these busts apparently belong to a military type and than, according to Claude Brenot, object in l. hand is neither a mappa nor a sceptre, but a small dagger called pugio … Bastien usually calls this artefact parazonium … It is possible that on some busts object in l. hand is lituus, a crooked wand used by augurs.
Now, the bust on my coin (and the few other specimens I’ve seen of the type) seems to be cuirassed and not draped. As for the object in left hand, it doesn’t seem to be a mappa, nor a sceptre, a pugio, or a parazonium. The design doesn’t look like the litui depicted on earlier coin types either. Does anyone have a better suggestion?